Thursday, February 14, 2008

One thing that comes to mind for me is this: what is Matrix Energetics without Quantum phraseology? There's been a lot of talk about explanation and metaphor, but could there be any such activity as Matrix Energetics (ing) without Quantum Phraseology? Is Quantum phraseology part of its process, irrespective of whether people are satisfied reflecting upon it under the terms used in the reality it constructs? Or is the practice divorceable from this phraseology?

Am curious is all..
__________________

Just my opinion,

I guess it could be. I suspect if one were to use Spiritual phraseology or magic phraseology instead and yet each one if these phraseology's have their own inherit limitations just as the Quantum phraseology seems too.

I know Richard Bartlett is very well versed in QP (over 60-100 books and research in the field) and is changing his understanding of his own model at present, moving even further out with 4 aspect based theory rather than two aspect based theory (i.e Thomas Bearden "Excalibur Briefing") He is working on incorporating anti-gravity, anti-matter, etc. into the model explanation. I'm even less versed in this aspect of Physics/Quantum Physics than what little I know of it at present.

My suspension, and I only have my filters to speak through, is that the Quantum phraseology would seem to have the least amount of limitations, (resistance, baggage) so to speak as it is not USUALLY so emotionally charged when discussed.

Again, I suspect more folks have definite set attitudes, beliefs, etc in regards to religious/spiritual or magical phraseology than they do in regards to Quantum phraseology. My suspicion is they have already made up their minds where religious/spiritual or magical terms, practices and limitations are concerned and less so as far as Quantum Physics goes.

As far as ME without QP I like the Abraham-Hicks model as it talks about spiritual phraseology from more of a structure/process POV which has a tendency to negate or lessen the emotional charge and present practical strategies and yet there are some where the emotional charge is still pretty strong and that is probably why they use the presupposition/belief A-H is only for those who are being attracted to it. (Vibrational Relativity so to speak.)

Where ME goes beyond A-H is the immediacy of change and the shift of vibration from low to high in a matter of moments . Where A-H uses alignment of belief (thought) and feeling (emotion) to create change which unfolds over time (and it can be a very short time when one has practiced aligning thoughts and feelings), ME goes to work on the level where space/time and matter are all made up and made out of photons (light and information). Or at least that is the belief that one works from.

So my thought is if one where not going to use a Quantum phraseology, a miracle or Alchemy phraseology may be in order or a useful phraseology. Now here is the twist for me. In my model (I know it is not real, just my model) the how (not the what or why) of miracles and Alchemy is explained by QP. At least that is how I logically map over the process.

To Your Best,
Doc

1 Comments:

At 2:24 AM, Blogger Doc Results said...

Without Quantum Phraseology one could use religious terms or Magi-ck terminology in fact Level 3 is completely Magi-ck and one can also use Scalar Waves and Torsion Field terminology as well.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home